🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."